Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Personal development

Temperament / Personality / and other Self Help Articles

The Art of Communicating

Saturday August 31, 2002 by Hal

Introduction: how communication works by providing shared understanding.

Good communication is as stimulating as black coffee and just as hard to sleep after. Anne Morrow Lindbergh, ‘Gift from the Sea’

The word communicate comes from the latin communis or common. We speak of a common room that everyone shares or a university commons where everyone shares the space. It indicates that two people or two groups have something shared in common but in our world today I maintain that there is nothing common about communication. Many of the world’s problems and disputes can be traced to poor communication.

The dictionary defines communication as the transmission of information, thought or feeling so that it is satisfactorily received or understood. As a working definition we’ll consider that communication has been successful if there is shared understanding between those trying to communicate.

So what is the result of shared understanding? What are the implications of a lack of shared understanding? Does shared understanding guarantee acceptance, openness and trust between people and groups? I maintain that while good communication doesn’t guarantee our lives will be enhanced, poor communication will make bad situations worse and make it difficult to have and maintain open, useful relationships in life.

The outcome, then, of successful communication should be to increase understanding and thereby improve relationships - and who doesn’t need improved relationships?

Families, co-workers, governments all need better communication. So let’s examine what happens when we communicate, where the problems lie, and what we can each do to improve our communication skills.

I. The pieces of the communication process

Communication is a two-way street, and people tend to structure their phrases along well-traveled linguistic routes to optimize thier chances of being understood. Christopher Manning Stanford University

Communication is a process; that is, it has definable steps that can be examined. We will look at communicating as a cycle going round and round unendingly. Remember, however, that examining the communication process is like putting your VCR on pause; you look at a frozen snapshot of a dynamic, unending process. It’s often been said that one cannot not communicate unless you’re dead or unconscious; communication takes place - for bad or for good - when we’re trying and when we’re not.

<i>A.   Sender</i>

The sender has something he wants to share with someone else. In our simplified model, the sender is the person communicating. Unfortunately the sender’s information is in his mind. While much work has been done on trying to prove ESP, for most of us we’ve got to get the information we want to share out of our mind and into the other person’s mind by other means.

<i>B.   Receiver</i>

The receiver is just that - the other person or persons that the sender is trying to communicate with. What we’ll find is that the receiver has some obstacles in the way that will affect whether shared understanding is achieved or not. While the sender has the responsibility to craft a clear message, the receiver has additional responsibilities of hearing, listening, and providing feedback.

<i>C.   A message</i>

The message is not just some words. The message is a rich combination of thoughts, feelings, words, and meanings. Even a sender that says, “it’s simple”, doesn’t realize the blended nature of the message they want to convey. Many communication problems stem from the idea that communication is simple.

<i>D.   Some ways of generating a signal</i>

Speak clearly, if you speak at all; carve every word before you let it fall. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1809 - 1894) The signal we are speaking of is how we encode the message in our heads and broadcast it to the receiver. We’ll find that this includes more than the sounds of words; it can include feelings, attitudes, and our unique personality. If you think about this, all communication is indirect in that we use the tools of language and nonverbal communication to attempt to share what we are experiencing inside ourselves.

<i>E.   A brain</i>

I would while away the hours, Conversin’ with the flowers … If I only had a brain. The Scarecrow in the Wizard of OZ Our brains are rich, complicated places. All communication is filtered through our personality, our background, our upbringing, our culture, and our current state of being. When you are tired or stressed or in circumstances that are unpleasant, communication becomes that much harder.

<i>F.   Shared understanding</i>

Speak properly, and in as few words as you can, but always plainly; for the end of speech is not ostentation but to be understood. William Penn

We return to our definition. The degree to which someone understands what we are trying to communicate will depend on many factors. How much alike are we? Do we share any background experiences? Are our language skills, attitudes, beliefs similar or dissimilar? What assumptions have we made about each other based on stereotypes?

It’s probably fair to say that the degree of understanding could be rated on a scale from very well understood to completely misunderstood. And anyone who says “I understand perfectly” is probably deceiving themselves.

<i>G.   Feedback</i>

Feedback in our model are the reactions of the receiver that are being communicated back to the sender. Feedback causes the sender to modify his message to increase the chances of its being understood by the receiver. Each of us has experienced the feeling “they don’t have a clue about what I’m trying to say”. How did we reach this conclusion? By interpreting the feedback the receiver is generating. This feedback can be verbal or nonverbal.

<i>H.   Communication blocked by noise</i>

The factor of “noise” may occur anywhere along the communication line, and it may be physical, physiological, or psychological in nature. William Brooks “Speech Communication”

When using radio to communicate, the static sometimes is so strong that the message is lost. Communication theorists call this kind of interruption during communication “noise”. For our purposes noise is any part of the communication process that diminishes shared understanding. Noise can be found in any part of our model. The sender can have poor communication skills. The receiver may be unable to receive the message for a variety of reasons. The channels they use to communicate may be inappropriate for the situation. Feedback may be misinterpreted or ignored.

As we continue we will examine noise factors that decrease shared understanding and ways of eliminating or reducing the noise so that communication has a better chance.

II. Temperament and Communication

Temperament comes from the Latin tem perave, which means to mix. It relates to the fact that we are each a unique mixture of personality traits - background, intelligence, feelings, education, culture and on and on. It seems obvious but your temperament impacts your communication style.

<i>A.   What is temperament?</i>

Temperament can also be called personality type and incorporates self-image or self-esteem.

We’ll talk more about self-image later but now we’ll focus on our “natural” temperament or personality that we inherit along with our eye color and body type. The ancients thought that temperament was caused by the mixture of certain bodily fluids called humours.

<i>B.   The four types</i>

Why four? Why not 104? Over the centuries, through observation and study, it has been determined that each of us is a blend of four distinct personality types - and more specifically we are usually a blend of two of the four types. Who wrote this rule? How do we know it’s true? Again the evidence is mostly empirical or by experience though the underlying concepts come from the work of Carl Jung.

For our purposes, we’ll use the ancient Greek nomenclature for temperament types - Choleric, Phlegmatic, Sanguine, and Melancholy. These are certainly only one way of discussing the four - other models use the names of animals, the acronym DiSC, and the most famous - the Meyers-Briggs naming system.

Temperament strongly affects communication style. But so does our cultural background, so does our educational experience. The point is that temperament is only one part of our communication style.

The choleric type is sometimes called the Driver. A choleric person is goal-oriented, no-nonsense, hard-nosed person. They are extraverted, strong willed persons. You can spot a choleric by their impatient, action-oriented style.

As regards communicating, the choleric gets straight to the point and is not much concerned with the feelings of others. They say what they mean and it can often be pointed and critical.

The sanguine temperament is an outgoing, warm, people person. They are talkers and are concerned with the feelings of others. They are best when meeting and greeting others. They are extraverted, warm, and enthusiastic.

The sanguine is loath to hurt others’ feelings and will avoid conflict at almost any price. Their communication style is outgoing and talkative. They will often touch the person they are talking to.

The melancholy is highly organized, detailed, and critical. You can spot a melancholy by their organized desktop or workspace. They are introverted and often moody. They dislike their anyone moving their “stuff”.

As a communicator, the melancholy will be precise, detailed and critical. They often feel they are “right” because they have taken the time to carefully analyze whatever subject they are talking about.

The phlegmatic is the quietest of the four types. While generally calm on the surface they are the most likely to be anxious internally when communicating.

Again I want to emphasize that no one is purely one temperament type. Another presentation I do on understanding temperament goes into much more detail on the 16 combinations of personality traits.

Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves. Carl Jung (1857-1961)

In a nutshell, personality affects communication because each style has a different primary way of communicating. Cholerics want “just the facts, ma’am”. Sanguines want to talk, and talk, and talk. Melancholies want clear concise detailed information and Phlegmatics just want to get along. If you can adapt your natural style to be more like the other person’s style, you’ll find it easier to get their attention and, ultimately, share understanding with them.

III. Self concept and Communication

Self-concept or self image is that internal picture we hold of ourselves - it’s who WE think WE are. The amazing thing is that often others hold different pictures of us that don’t agree with who we think we are. Each of us communicates out of our self-image. While affected by temperament, self-concept goes beyond our built in personality style.

<i>A.   How is our self-image developed?</i>

Self-image develops as we develop. As we grow we each seek clues from around us that help us define who “we” are. Into our search comes “significant others”. A significant other is defined as someone who’s input we accept as having validity. This group includes many people such as parents, siblings, friends, teachers, and, again, anyone that we receive input from concerning our image of ourselves.

For good and for bad, we take in these other peoples’ opinions. They tell us how acceptable we are, they give us messages about our abilities or lack of abilities. As we develop we hear these voices tell us that we’re good or that we’re bad or that we can do anything we set our minds to or that we’ll never amount to anything.

<i>B.   How does our self-image change?</i>

The problem here is that other people express their opinion - and that’s all it is. No matter how well a parent knows us or a teacher observes us, what they express about us is their opinion. How many people have been called “shy” for so long that they accept it as true? One interesting story deals with Suzzane Sommers. She had a verbally abusive father who told her she was no good, dumb, ugly and would never amount to anything. This affected her well into her adult life and was reflected in a series of bad relationships and failed life projects.

Only after her father died did she begin to see that she had worth and value. Through a great deal of work she was able to begin to change how she saw herself and her self image changed into that of a competent, intelligent woman.

<i>C.   How self-image affects communication</i>

This story illustrates how self-image affects our communication. If you’ve been known as shy or dumb or a teacher’s pet, this affects how you see yourself and how others who know you react to you. In my personal life, I grew up extremely shy and bashful. I did not react well in social situations and, because I grew up in a small town going to school with the same kids year after year, this “social retardation” followed me throughout high school.

But when I left for college 600 miles away, the realization began to dawn on me that no one there knew me as shy or bashful. I was able to dig out from under that old self-image and become more outgoing and more “myself” - the “myself” I wanted to be.

So our self-concept may contain information that is wrong and cause many communication problems. Self study and possibly professional counseling are means of rooting out self concept problems.

IV. Non-verbal Communication

Communication takes place on many levels simultaneously. We often tend to think of only the words that are spoken but that part of the message may only account for 20% of communication. So what’s happening in the other 80%?

<i>A.   What is it?</i>

What you do speaks so loud that I cannot hear what you say. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803 - 1882)

Non-verbal communication is everything else BUT the words. It includes many components including vocal qualities such as tone of voice, as well as gestures, body language, accents and attitudes. Significant communication can take place without a word being spoken.

<i>B.   Where is it learned?</i>

The face is the mirror of the mind, and eyes without speaking confess the secrets of the heart St. Jerome (342 - 420 AD)

The key to understanding non-verbal communication is to study its’ roots. Babies in the crib cannot understand words but they quickly learn to respond to voices and facial expressions. We begin to learn what a person means from their voice and their body language long before we understand the words themselves.

And this is significant because as we grow we continue to interpret non-verbal communication at an unconscious level; not even aware that we are analyzing and critiquing the other person for their non-verbal message while attending to what they are saying verbally.

<i>C.   Why do we pay attention to it?</i>

Jeff Foxworthy tells a story about the difference between men and women when looking at a new house. The woman is deciding how to decorate, the man is wondering where someone will try to break in. So to lower the chances of a break in, Jeff compares the well cared for lawn versus an overgrown lawn. According to Jeff, when you see an uncut lawn with a car motor hanging from the porch and a dog on a chain, “that’s a house where a gun lives!”

He’s saying that how we choose to dress, how we talk, where we live - all are examples of nonverbal communication.

We can’t help but automatically process non-verbal cues as we communicate. How many times have we “tuned someone out” because of some non-verbal behavior that affects us. Because it is learned unconsciously in infancy, non-verbal communications comes “online” without us thinking about it. It might be someone’s accent, their perceived level of education or learning, their vocal qualities or some other behavior - we always pay attention to it.

<i>D.   How can we use it more effectively?</i>

Knowing how powerfully our nonverbal cues are can allow us to “shape” our message. By paying attention to how we speak, how we look, how our voice sound, we can improve our chances of attaining shared understanding.

At the same time, consciously paying attention to our reactions to other’s nonverbal messages will give us more information than we are getting by only attending to the words.

V. Listening

One of the biggest problems in communication relates to listening. How many parents have chanted the mantra “you’re not listening” to a child? How many people have gotten lost because of only half-listening to a set of directions?

<i>A.   Listening is NOT the same as hearing.</i>

Listening and hearing are not exactly the same thing. While it is true that you must hear in order to listen, it isn’t always true that if you hear you ARE listening. Hearing is a function carried out by your brain wherein the sounds received by our ears are assigned meaning. But just because our brain understands the words doesn’t mean that our minds will understand what is received.

<i>B.   Problems related to listening</i>
    1.  Our brains are much faster than our mouths.

Part of the problem is that our minds are much faster than our mouths. We typically speak anywhere from 30 to 100 words per minute but our minds can process information much faster than that. So if the first few words do not “hook” our attention we will rapidly “drift” off to think of something else.

    <i>2.   We lack interest or we prejudge what we are hearing.</i>

This hearing/listening disparity not only results in a lack of interest but can also cause us to prejudge what we are hearing. If we perceive a person to be uninteresting or dull or abrasive, these perceptions will cause us to judge the speaker and color what they are saying through our own attitudinal “filters”.

    <i>3.   We don't seek or give feedback.</i>

Remember that our model of communication is a cycle - an ongoing give and take of information being shared. If we purposefully or accidentally give no feedback, the sender will have no idea or a distorted idea of how they are communicating. Distorted feedback could include agreeing with the sender when we really have no clue of what they are trying to say.

VI. Assertion and confrontation

Not all communication is pleasant. Emotionally charged conversations can cause their own problems that have to be dealt with. Sanguine and Phlegmatic temperaments (the two introverted styles) are especially prone to “clamming up” when the Choleric and Melancholies crank up. The easier thing to do in these situations is to withdraw into ourselves and not even try.

The answer is a learned skill called assertiveness. The first thing to be learned is that because a person tries to dominate a communication event doesn’t mean it’s their “right”. Each of us has as much right to be heard and understood as any other. Convincing yourself that this is true can be a long process - but until you believe it, you’ll never take the initiative to stick up for yourself. There are books and training tapes available that can help you. One classic that is still available in bookstores and libraries is “When I say No I feel Guilty.”

Once you’ve begun to believe that you have a right to be heard, you can begin to practice simple but powerful behaviors that will help you.

The formula is “D”escribe the behavior that upsets you such as “when you interrupt me …”, “E”xplain how it makes you feel, “when you interrupt me I feel angry …”, “S”pecify what you want to be different, “I would prefer that you say … “, and “C”onsequences, “If you can’t do this, then …”

Assertiveness may not make you feel less stressed but it can, if practiced, improve the chances of your being heard and understood.

VII. How to improve your communication skills

So what are some specific behaviors that you can implement that will improve your communication quotient? Here are several.

<i>A.   Listen - don't assume.</i>

Make sure you have finished speaking before your audience has finished listening. Dorothy Sarnoff

The key to to improved listening is using the “extra” time available in the hearing process. As you listen to someone, examine what they’re saying, question your understanding of what is being said, involve yourself in the conversation.

<i>B.   Improve your self-concept.</i>

Since all communication is filtered through our self-image, it makes sense that the better that self-image is, the better our chance of sharing understanding. Improving self-concept involves challenging assumptions we have about ourselves. Unlearning old attitudes and feelings can be a long and involved process; additionally replacing these dysfunctional attitudes with new and better feelings and attitudes can be a struggle.

C. Learn to decipher non-verbal communication.

Remember that non-verbal communication is processed by each of us almost unconsciously. By becoming consciously aware of another’s tone off voice, posture, gestures, and facial expressions, we will raise our level of understanding several notches.

What is essential to a person’s word is the meaning given to it by that person - the thought, feeling or action that person associates with it and hopes to convey to others. Through our word we literally give to others a piece of our mind. Through others’ words we may know their thoughts and feelings and share in their lives. Dallas Willard

<i>E.   Ask questions - don't pretend to understand when you don't.</i>

The “old saw” has a lot of truth - to assume makes an “ass” out of “u” and “me”. Too often we nod when someone asks if we understand when understanding is no where in sight. So much of the time we don’t wish to appear foolish so we feign understanding.

Conclusion - the benefits of improved communication.

The ability to communicate effectively has implications for every part of life. Better communication can improve family relationships, enhance business relationships, and improve overall quality of life. Think again of how many disputes, arguments and disagreements were all rooted in poor communication?

FAQs on Self-concept/Self-image

Tuesday August 20, 2002 by Hal

We hear many things about poor self image or low self esteem. What is self image and how does it affect us? 1. Just what is my self-image? Is it different than my self-concept?

Self-concept or self image is that internal picture we hold of ourselves - it’s who WE think WE are. The amazing thing is that often others hold different pictures of us that don’t agree with who we think we are. Each of us communicates out of our self-image. While affected by temperament, self-concept goes beyond our built in personality style.

2. I am generally shy. Why am I this way? Can I change?

Each of us has an inherited temperament. Our temperament combined with our life experience equals our personality. Certain temperament types are more introverted; that is, naturally more quiet. Anyone can change the outward behaviors, which is why we have Dale Carnegie Courses and Toastmasters to teach people to be more outgoing. But while the outward behavior may change, the inward temperament usually does not. In other words, you may not seem shy though inwardly you still are.

For more information on temperament and personality see my article at www.selfgrowth.com. (Search on the word temperament.)

3. How can you change someone else’s self image? How can I change my own self-image?

Self-image is composed of natural temperament (see above) and input from significant others (teachers, parents, friends, enemies, and self). It takes time and a repeated message to influence how a person feels about themselves. If you want to change your self-image you must change your “self talk”; those things you say about yourself unthinkingly. (I’m so clumsy, I never win, etc.) To change another’s’ self-image requires first that the other sees you as significant to them and then that you provide them a consistent, believable message to them over time. Changing self-image is not an easy task and the person involved must also believe that change is possible.

4. One of my children is outgoing, the other reserved. Why is this?

Read again the section above on how self-image is formed. If you as parents have different temperaments, then your children inherited a combination of temperament traits from each of you. My oldest daughter is quiet and reserved much like I am. My youngest is naturally outgoing and talkative much like her mother. Remember that self-image is also influenced by life experience - if you push a quiet child they may become more open; if reluctantly. If you “quash” an outgoing child, they may become more reserved.

5. What factors influence my self-image?

First, temperament. Then upbringing and the message of parents. Then childhood peers. Then self-talk - what you say inwardly about yourself. Then teachers and relatives other than parents. Finally things like significant authors whose work influences you.

6. I have had many bad experiences in life. Can I change how I feel about myself?

This can often take the help of a counselor or coach if the trauma has been bad enough. But changing self-image means changing how you see yourself. It first involves challenging the beliefs you have about yourself. Sit down and write out the key messages you believe to be true about yourself. I’m ugly, I’m shy, I’m intelligent, I never succeed - all those things that influence how you act and feel. Now challenge them - are they really true? Or have I just given them too much ‘sway’ in my life.

Now develop a new list of beliefs about yourself. Imagine that you get to move to a new place where no one knows you. How would you behave differently in those circumstances? Thirdly, slowly begin to implement these new behaviors. Reinforce to yourself that this behavior is you - not what you said or were told before. And finally, take the time to change - beliefs about self don’t change overnight.

7. I always seem to be trying to please others. How can I stop this?

Pleasing others can reflect many things. You may be craving attention that you lacked from parents. You may fear rejection and work to avoid it at all costs. You may be seeking the approval of others in order to validate yourself.

Until you can find peace in being yourself, you will probably not be able to stop trying to please others. One recommendation I have is the “Boundaries” series of books by Drs. Cloud and Townsend.

Hal Warfield is a speaker, teacher and coach. Contact him at warfield@pobox.com.

FAQs on Assertiveness / Confrontation

Tuesday August 20, 2002 by Hal

I wish we could all get along … But what can you do when “getting along” doesn’t work? 1. Why do I have so much trouble confronting people?

Oh, get over it. No, I’m just kidding. While we seem to return to temperament over and over again, it is true that outgoing Cholerics (see FAQs on Temperament and Personality) and critical Melancholies find it easier to confront than introverted Phlegmatics. Culture plays a large part in this too - in the easygoing south it may be more difficult to confront than in the Northeast. But in this we must be careful of stereotyping. This is true with gender as well - it may seem easier to confront if you are a man; the stereotype is that women are raised not to confront. Whatever the reason, confrontation is neither always easy nor comfortable.

2. What is the difference between confrontation and assertion?

Assertion is often defined as defending one’s rights. However getting a clear picture of what are rights are can be difficult. When can I say “this far and no farther”? The assertiveness ‘movement’ gave rise in the 90s to teaching about boundaries. While dated, the book “When I say NO, I feel guilty” has good definitions of rights and some tools for asserting yourself. The whole “Boundaries” series of books can help an individual define where they must “draw the line”.

Confrontation on the other hand is often thought of being in someone’s face. Assertiveness often considers the feelings of the other while confrontation doesn’t care about whose feelings are hurt.

3. When is confrontation really necessary?

Confrontation may never become an issue with you if you are able to “let things slide”. The easygoing phlegmatic most often puts up with the negative behavior of others without feeling the need to confront. Confrontation becomes necessary when you believe that your rights or your safety or your self-respect are being trampled under foot.

Confrontation can be thought of as “the last resort” when you’ve tried everything else you can think of and still feel you are being wronged.

4. Confrontation always leads to anger with me. How can I confront without becoming angry?

Confrontation almost always has a strong emotional element included. If you feel you’ve been mistreated and wronged, anger is bound to be a part of your reaction. And, in truth, anger may be appropriate if you feel confrontation is the only answer. The trick is to confront - that is to lay out your demands and the consequences - without letting anger control you. Use the anger to give energy to your approach. Remember that confrontation may be your “last resort” before ending a relationship, a job, or a friendship.

5. I don’t really care if I upset the other person. Why should I be concerned about other’s feelings?

If you take a couple of temperament tests you may find you are a choleric. Choleric’s are hard driving, straightforward individuals who don’t really care much about other’s feelings. You may have grown up in an environment or culture where being bluntly honest was valued over the feelings of others. While you may not be concerned with another’s feelings, it still makes sense to avoid alienating people if possible - and this involves taking feelings into account.

6. What is the best way to confront?

NOT when you’re out of control or extremely angry. NOT on the spur of the moment. A confrontation should be thought through and planned. What are the consequences? Will I lose a job? A friend? Will I put myself in danger?

Planning to confront means writing down your thoughts and feelings. It also has a “consequences” section. In other words, you confront and offer consequences. If you don’t stop this behavior then I’ll be forced to (fill in the blank).

Be SURE you’re not bluffing when you offer consequences and be sure you think through the possible outcomes before you confront someone.

If you have a situation you’d like a “second opinion” on, write me at the email address below.

Hal Warfield is a speaker, teacher and coach. Contact him at warfield@pobox.com

A Simple Paper/Pencil Temperament Test

Thursday August 15, 2002 by Hal

A first step toward discovering your natural temperament type.

( read more... )

Looking into Yourself: the power of Introspection

Tuesday August 13, 2002 by

Have you ever wondered what part you might have played in a quarrel? In a communication breakdown? In a misunderstanding? Don’t feel bad or be surprised if you answered “no”.

Why? Why is it easier to say that the problem is the “other guy” and not us? It seems to be inherently easier to say “I’m OK, you’re not” when considering interpersonal interactions. We naturally tend to look outside ourselves for the reasons for problems. Less than 5% of people naturally tend to look within themselves rather than without for answers to problems. Introspection is defined as the inspection of one’s own thoughts and feelings; the process of self-examination.

Encyclopedia Britannica adds that introspection is the process of observing the operations of one’s own mind with a view to discovering the laws that govern the mind. What laws govern your mind? Can you see into your motives, your psychology, and your self-image?

Most of us don’t take time to consider how we got to be the way we are now. We “just are” and that’s as far as it goes. The truth of the matter is we didn’t just “get that way”; we were influenced by a vast multitude of factors: genetics, culture, family, education, social orientation, trauma, birth order - the list goes on and on. Each of these factors was woven into the tapestry that makes us who we are - that causes us to react to others in the ways we do.

But in an argument or misunderstanding we don’t usually think, “what is my part in this? What did I do or say to cause this misunderstanding.” It’s much easier to look without rather than within. Taking responsibility for ourselves means being willing enough and honest enough to question ourselves about what drives us - and much more than that, introspection means a willingness to change what we see in order to make changes.

FAQs

I’m having trouble even being interested in the topic. Why should I even be concerned about introspection?

This may not be an answer you like, but you don’t need to be concerned about your inner life if you want to continue the way you are today. However if you have even an inkling that you might be the cause of someone else’s unhappiness or that your self-centeredness is the cause of some problems between you and others, then introspection is a skill you might want to cultivate.

I’m okay; problems I encounter are in others. How do I convince them of that?

Most of us are “okay” with ourselves. How could we be otherwise? We are so used to living with ourselves that it’s difficult to even conceive that we might be less than perfect. While some of the problems might and probably are in others, this does not give us the right to excuse ourselves from doing some inner exploration. Before you try to convince someone else that they are the problem, you must take the time to question your own motives. If you can be honest with yourself then you will be better able to speak about the other person’s problem.

What kinds of questions do I ask myself? What am I trying to discover about myself?

Not “why do they make me so angry?” but “why do I get angry?” is a better approach. Am I being selfish, self-centered, or just wanting my own way? Am I trying to manipulate the other person through guilt or bad feelings? Am I being lazy? These are only a starting place.

How do I get someone else to be introspective?

There is no sure way to get another person to be introspective. Perhaps if they see you being more thoughtful about your motives they may question themselves. But in the long run you can’t make anyone do anything about their inner life unless they see the benefit for themselves.

Why should I change? What does it benefit me?

My personal belief is that the self-discovery found through being introspective is a reward unto itself. But, more practically, self-honesty can yield greater peace in life - less strife within and less strife with others.

There are things about my (spouse, boss, friend, kids) that infuriate me - how does being introspective make a difference?

I’ve found time after time that the thing that irritates us about another is often a weakness we have in ourselves. Seeing that weakness in another person infuriates us when actually we have the same problem - if we would be honest with ourselves.

Introspection is not a cure-all for relationship problems. It is a valuable tool for growing up inside and becoming a happier person.

Hal Warfield is a speaker, teacher and coach. Contact him at warfield@midsouth.rr.com or at http://www.halwarfield.com.